
There it is- or at least one part of it. I actually like this picture- it shows a modern, busy city that appears to be thriving. But that does not make it beautiful. Notice the lack of any distinctive buildings; if you Google "Seoul skyline", you get either photos from far away or some rather drab up close shots. No landmark buildings here, just big and boxy high rises built several decades ago, for the most part. Seoul is not blessed by geography- although the Han river effectively divides the city in half, neither side of the river boasts a distinct panorama, a la London, Hong Kong (ok I'm cheating it's a bay there) and so many other metropolises. Seoul boasts... high rises. Many of them. As in apartments, usually. Seoul was rebuilt, shockingly quickly, after being considerably damaged during the Korean war. Rebuilt and expanded- where I live now (south of the river) was empty until being designated a new commercial district, perhaps 20 years ago, judging by the high rise offices surrounding me. The old adage "It's the economy, stupid" appears to have been adopted as law as roads, subways, apartments, and offices were all constructed in a drab fashion, one after another, as quickly as possible in order to boost the economy and modernize Korea. There are few parks here, and those that exist generally lack in landscaping or any ornamental beauty. This is so strange to me considering Koreans revere nature and the mountains surrounding Seoul, well the mountains anywhere in Korea I suppose.

It is rainy season here, and absolutely pouring now. Usually rain makes cities feel cleaner, perhaps a little calmer, but for me that doesn't seem to be the case here. Everything blends to shades of grey- the sky into the buildings into the streets. This photo of my neighborhood taking shortly after I arrived shows it well I think. See how few colors there are- admittedly perhaps a better camera could have done more, but it would take some real photoshopping to beautify this one...
There are a few brightspots, mostly newer buildings, in Seoul. So hope endures. But I fear they would have to completely start over (not impossible, considering the Koreans and their work ethic) in order to create any semblance of a balanced city with a high quality of urban life.
But the question is, does this matter? I'm not sure- as I have mentioned before, Seoul is a fun city. I like my job and my life here. I cope with my tiny apartment and the lack of aesthetic beauty in the city. But what would it mean if along with the fun and satisfaction I have found here the city was beautiful, like Stockholm, or architecturally interesting, like Berlin? Would it merely be the icing on the cake, or would I perceive the city differently? I think the latter. Seoul, more than any other city, feels like a series of trade offs. Terribly big but cheap public transportation. Poor air quality but nearby and accessable mountains. Several candidates for the city centre, or the "heart of the city" to use a guidebook cliche, but no place that screams "I'm in Seoul!" Or maybe even "I'm in Korea!" for that matter... These situations would still exist, were the city to beautify itself, but I can't help feeling like at least I would identify more personally with the city were this the case. I want to identify with this place, my home for at least one year, but although I have pleasant associations and happy memories in just a short time, Seoul is generally an indistinct part of this. I could have been anywhere, I just happened to be in Seoul. Place has always been important to me, and perhaps I am overly preoccupied with a connection to places, since I have for most intents and purposes abandoned places I was connected to when I was younger. Do Koreans show civic pride in Seoul, and I am just unaware of it? It certainly feels like Seoul is more of a means to an end than an end in and of itself....
Some more music links- not sure if anyone even likes these, but oh well. There is good music here if you want to check it out. This seems appropriate to a rainy day. I didn't like Fleet Foxes when I heard them last fall, and now I'm not sure why. Their album was Pitchfork's album of the year, despite no critic naming it the best album of last year...
